High risk patients
We serve as the sole source of care for many of the highest-risk patients.1–3 A disproportionate number of our patients, compared with the general population, suffer from alcoholism, substance abuse, and mental illness.4 These high-risk patients not surprisingly have higher recidivism, higher costs, and worse overall outcomes. Many therefore see the ED as the source of every problem in the healthcare system [Washington State Hospital Association, RAND Report]. But many of us prefer to think of ourselves in more positive terms: as the source for potential transformation of healthcare. [UCSD News, NY Times Blog]
Blog series: Public health + EM
So the goal of this new series is to talk about that how we can affect public health via EM (academic and otherwise). Administrators seem to believe that we, the pit-docs and ED nurses and EMTs, are really the key to reducing cost and improving outcomes [ACEP News]. So let’s do it, ourselves. Let’s have an honest and ongoing discussion about how to do this. Let’s talk about how “academics” isn’t just about education or research, but how it means influencing the trajectory of healthcare on a systemic (as well as personal) level. Let’s become active voices in restructuring the system in a way that benefits us and our patients.
What do you think?
Thoughts? Feedback? Do YOU believe that the ED has a public health role? Or do you think we’re at the mercy of the winds of change in healthcare?
Future topics
- What is physician advocacy, and why is it part of our job description?
- The role of research in EM
- mHealth, digital health, and Medicine 2.0: What does it meant for the ED?
Shameless Plug: Interested in discussing this in person? Attend our talk at the 2013 ACEP Scientific Assembly on “ED Superusers: Stop the Abuse, Stop the Violence, Breaking the Cycle” on Monday 10/14, 12:30-2:20pm.
Author information
The post Public health and EM: A new series by Dr. Megan Ranney appeared first on ALiEM.