Hilary Fairbrother, MD, MPH, FACEP
McGovern School of Medicine
University of Texas Health Houston
Department of Emergency Medicine
Vice Chair of Education
Houston, TX
Twitter: @hilaryfair
Objectives
- Define and review the PECARN, CHALICE, and CATCH algorithms
- Accurately apply and use the PECARN, CHALICE, and CATCH pediatric head injury algorithms to better utilize computerized tomography in the pediatric population
Presentation Outline
- Pediatric head trauma epidemiology + risks of radiation
- Definition of head trauma algorithms:
- PECARN
- CHALICE
- CATCH
- Practical application of these algorithms with pearls and pitfalls
- Case 1 – CATCH
- Case 2 – CHALICE
- Case 3 – PECARN
- Conclusion and recommendations for algorithm use in everyday practice
References:
- Easter JS et al. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE Rules for Children with Minor Head Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Emerg Med 2014. PMID: 24635987
- Babl FE et al. Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study. Lancet 2017. PMID: 28410792
Post Peer Reviewed By: Salim R. Rezaie, MD (Twitter: @srrezaie)
The post Rebellion 21: To CT or Not to CT – PECARN, CHALICE, and CATCH Algorithms via Hilary Fairbrother, MD appeared first on REBEL EM - Emergency Medicine Blog.