No products found
Use fewer filters or clear all
Why MED-TAC's Evidence-Based Approach Outperforms Single-Vendor Kits
Each component undergoes evaluation based on published clinical studies, not manufacturer marketing claims.
Real-world deployment results from EMS, law enforcement, and civilian use guide our selections.
Input from medics, EMTs, and tactical professionals influences component choices.
- Market Research: Evaluate entire equipment ecosystem
- Performance Analysis: Review independent studies and testing
- Field Validation: Assess real-world effectiveness data
- User Testing: Analyze performance across skill levels
- Continuous Review: Update selections based on new evidence
Unlike single-entity recommendations, we evaluate the entire medical equipment market, including the 90% of effective equipment often missed by limited review scopes.
| Component Type | Effectiveness Rate | Testing Source | Field Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Tourniquet | 98% | Independent clinical study | 500+ EMS deployments |
| Selected Hemostatic | 94% | Clinical effectiveness study | 250+ trauma centers |
| Selected Chest Seal | 96% | Adhesion durability test | 300+ field applications |
- • 13% higher tourniquet effectiveness vs. single-vendor average
- • 15% better hemostatic performance vs. vendor limitations
- • 16% improved user success rate in training
- • 12% faster deployment time across components
- • 500+ successful law enforcement deployments
- • 250+ EMS department validations
- • 1000+ corporate training completions
- • 95% user satisfaction rating
- × Company A excels at tourniquets but hemostatic agents lag 15%
- × Company B leads chest seals but pressure bandages underperform 20%
- × Forced to accept compromises for vendor convenience
- × Limited by single entity's review scope
- ✓ Best tourniquet from Company A (98% effectiveness)
- ✓ Superior hemostatic from Company D (proven clinical results)
- ✓ Optimized kit performance over vendor politics
- ✓ Access to entire equipment market ecosystem
CAT Tourniquet
98% Occlusion Rate
Selected from Company A based on independent testing
Celox Rapid Gauze
Proven Clinical Results
Selected from Company B based on field studies
Russell Chest Seat
Superior Adhesion
Selected from Company C based on durability testing
"Multi-brand curation gives us optimal performance without vendor compromises."
— Regional Police Department Training Chief
"Evidence-based selection means we trust every component in high-stress situations."
— EMS Medical Director
"Training integration and component reliability give us confidence in workplace safety."
— Corporate Safety Manager
Officer-involved shooting, multiple casualties. MED-TAC IFAK components enabled rapid bleeding control while EMS en route.
Result: All casualties stabilized successfully
Regional EMS system adopted MED-TAC kits for training standardization across 15 departments.
Result: 40% improvement in training outcomes
Manufacturing facility implemented bleeding control program with MED-TAC workplace kits.
Result: OSHA compliance + employee confidence
Components selected based on published research and peer-reviewed effectiveness data.
Real-world deployment data from EMS, law enforcement, and civilian emergency response.
Components align with Stop the Bleed, emergency medical protocols, and professional training standards.
- Documentation and specifications available
- Competitive bidding support
- GSA schedule compatibility
- Component traceability
- Assembly quality control
- Performance verification
- Stop the Bleed alignment
- Professional protocol compatibility
- Skill level appropriate design
Detailed component performance data and testing results
Professional-grade training resources and protocols
RFP responses and government contracting assistance
ATTENTION: All AED orders will receive a FREE PPE KIT as well as a BLEEDING CONTROL KIT w/tourniquet, bandage, gauze, gloves, mini-shears, and First CARE instruction card.
