Is the 6-12-12 adenosine approach always correct?

Dec 06, 12
Is the 6-12-12 adenosine approach always correct?

AdenosineVialThe ACLS-recommended dosing strategy of 6 mg, 12 mg, and 12 mg for adenosine may not be appropriate in every situation. There are a few instances when lower or higher dosing should be considered.

Caveat: All recommendations are data-based, but many factors affect successful conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) including proper line placement and administration technique.

ArrowUP   Option 1: Starting at higher dose

Caffeine is an adenosine blocker and can interfere with the successful reversion of PSVT. In fact, ingestion of caffeine less than 4 hours before a 6-mg adenosine bolus significantly reduced its effectiveness in the treatment of PSVT. An increased initial adenosine dose may be indicated for these patients.

Remember that theophylline may require higher dosing as well, because it is similar to caffeine (another methylxanthine), but is not prescribed much in the U.S. anymore.

Recommended dosing strategy [1]:

  • 1st dose: 12 mg (instead of 6)
  • 2nd/3rd doses: 18 mg (instead of 12)

ArrowDOWN Option 2: Starting at lower dose

Every so often a patient arrives in PSVT with their only IV access being through a hemodialysis port. The initial adenosine dose should be reduced if administered through a central line. Remember a central line delivers the adenosine right where you need it. This recommendation is supported by the 2010 ACLS guidelines. Cases of prolonged bradycardia and severe side effects have been reported after full-dose adenosine through a central line.

Also consider lower doses in patients concomitantly taking carbamazepine or dipyridamole or in those with a transplanted heart.

Recommended dosing strategy [2, 3, 4]:

  • 1st dose: 3 mg (instead of 6)
  • 2nd/3rd doses: 6 mg (instead of 12)

References

  1. Cabalag MS, et al. Recent caffeine ingestion reduces adenosine efficacy in the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Acad Emerg Med 2009;17(1):44-9. [PMID 20003123]
  2. Chang M, et al. Adenosine dose should be less when administered through a central line. Emerg Med 2002;22(2):195-8. [PMID 11858927]
  3. Neumar RW, et al. Part 8: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010;122:S729-S767. [PMID 20956256]
  4. McIntosh-Yellin NL, et al. Safety and efficacy of central intravenous bolus administration for termination of supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:741-5. [PMID 8354807]

Author information

Bryan D. Hayes, PharmD, DABAT, FAACT, FASHP

Bryan D. Hayes, PharmD, DABAT, FAACT, FASHP

Leadership Team, ALiEM
Creator and Lead Editor, Capsules and EM Pharm Pearls Series
Attending Pharmacist, EM and Toxicology, MGH
Associate Professor of EM, Division of Medical Toxicology, Harvard Medical School

The post Is the 6-12-12 adenosine approach always correct? appeared first on ALiEM.

Leave a Comment

Like articles like this one?

Join our Email List and get the latest TCCC/TECC/TEMS news bulletins, articles, product releases, and more!

Free Delivery

On all orders over $99 within CONUS and to APO/FPO

Easy Returns

We're here to help! Satisfaction Guaranteed

Knowledgeable Staff

Ready to assist you at a moment's notice

Safe& Secure Checkout

World’s most advanced and secure website encryption.