Welcome to our store!

New collections added on a weekly basis!

Now Accepting FSA & HSA cards

FREE SHIPPING

for all orders over $99.99 within the CONTINENTAL USA.

Should I Stay or Should I Go: Outpatient Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Marco Torres |

Background: The care of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is currently undergoing a paradigm shift in the US with an increasingly large percentage of patients being discharged home from the Emergency Department (ED).  It wasn’t too long ago that all patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) would be admitted for anticoagulation.  Some of the reasons for this were lack of literature to support outpatient therapy in the US, inability to arrange outpatient follow up, and, of course, medicolegal concerns.  Dr. Jeff Kline, one of the thought leaders in VTE, advocates for the outpatient treatment of “low-risk” patients using a modified Hestia criteria supplemented with additional criteria (POMPE-C) for patients with active cancer.  This publication is the initial results of his rivaroxaban-based treatment protocol.

What They Did:

  • Development of a Rivaroxaban based protocol to predict which patients are safe for outpatient treatment, diagnosed with DVT or PE
    • 1mg/kg Enoxaparin SQ and one 15mg rivaroxaban dose by mouth prior to discharge
    • Patients then took 15mg PO BID for 21 days followed by 20mg PO QD of Rivaroxaban until therapy completed
  • Prospective observational study at two US hospitals

Outcomes:

  • Acceptable outcomes were defined as:
    • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence ≤2.1%
    • Bleeding ≤9.4%
    • A pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT and PE trials was used to determine these numbers

Definitions:

  • Major bleeding: >2g/dL acute drop in hemoglobin or >2-unit blood transfusion, bleeding in a critical area, or bleeding that contributed to death
  • Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding: Bleeding that requires the patient to make an unscheduled visit to any health care provider for evaluation, permanently discontinue rivaroxaban, or significantly alter activities of daily living for more than a few days

Inclusion:

  • Low Risk patients were identified using a Modified Hestia Criteria and the POMPE-C tool in patients with active malignancy

Modified Hestia Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systolic Hypotension (<100mmHg in absence of history of low blood pressure at baseline)
  2. Contraindication to low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin treatment (active bleeding or high-risk postoperative status, creatinine clearance <30mL/min, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, or warfarin skin necrosis)
  3. Other medical condition requiring hospital treatment (sepsis, new or decompensated existing organ failure, intractable pain)
  4. Social condition requiring hospital treatment (homelessness with history of nonadherence to treatment, suspected neglect or abuse, untreated psychosis, severe alcohol or drug dependency)
  5. Coagulopathy (any INR >1.7) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 x109/L)
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Incarceration

POMPE-C Exclusion Criteria (Calculator Located HERE):

  • Patient Weight (lbs)
  • Highest respiratory rate (breaths per min)
  • SaO2 (%)
  • Heart rate >99 beats/min
  • Altered mental status
  • Respiratory distress
  • Do not resuscitate status
  • Unilateral limb swelling

Results:

  • 106 patients treated
    • 71 (68%) with DVT
    • 30 (28%) with PE
    • 5 (3%) with both
  • 0 Cases of VTE Recurrence (95% CI 0 – 3.4%)
  • 0 Cases of major or clinically relevant bleeding
  • 3 patients (2.8%) had recurrent DVT after cessation of therapy

Strengths:

  • 50% of the patients in this study were self-pay which is more realistic of practice in the US

Limitations:

  • Selection bias: only 27% of diagnosed PEs and 51% of diagnosed DVTs were discharged from the ED on rivaroxaban
  • 25% of patients did not follow up in clinic
  • No comparator group (only historical comparison)
  • No cost analysis of this protocol vs standard protocol

Discussion:

  • Patients deemed to be low risk were given 1mg/kg enoxaparin and one 15mg rivaroxaban tablet prior to discharge. Enoxaparin was given for two reasons:
    • 73% of patients in the EINSTEIN trials received heparin prior to receiving rivaroxaban
    • For this protocol enoxaparin was stocked in the ED, but rivaroxaban had to be ordered from the pharmacy causing delays in treatment
  • Initial treatment with rivaroxaban is 15mg PO BID for 21 days, followed by 20mg PO once a day for the duration of treatment (3 – 6 months)
  • Patients were only given 1 month worth of prescriptions for rivaroxaban, with the rest of the prescription being written at clinic follow up
  • Low income, uninsured patients were offered a free of charge or discounted rate for up to 1 year (jjpaf.org)
  • Follow up:
    • 1 – 2 days after discharge patient called to confirm ability to fill prescription and to answer questions
    • 1st follow-up appointment occurred approximately 3 weeks after diagnosis
    • 2nd follow up appointment at 3 – 6 months after diagnosis

Author Conclusion: “Patients diagnosed with VTE and immediately discharged from the ED while treated with rivaroxaban had a low rate of VTE recurrence and bleeding.”

Clinical Take Home Point: This is a nice proof of concept publication that further adds to the evidence for the safety of outpatient treatment of low risk DVT and PE in patients with very low complication rates.

References:

  1. Beam DM et al. Immediate Discharge and Home Treatment With Rivaroxaban of Low-Risk Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosed in Two U.S. Emergency Departments: A One-Year Preplanned Analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22 (7): 788 – 95. PMID: 26113241

For More Thoughts on This Topic Checkout:

Post Peer Reviewed By: Anand Swaminathan (Twitter: @EMSwami)

The post Should I Stay or Should I Go: Outpatient Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism appeared first on REBEL EM - Emergency Medicine Blog.

Leave a comment

Please note: comments must be approved before they are published.